im just saying if ww2 were a seris of 1v1 tank battles

However, if you're taking flak, it seems to me you've got many problem-areas under the aircraft to worry about. I know there is accident protection and flak fragmentation protection. So the question is, why have them at all? It seems so easy to defeat the system by just using incendiary bullets, which must be a whole lot cheaper than the rubbery fuel tank. The wing will be punctured, and the fuel will either explode, or catch fire and remain on fire. In other words, a self-sealing fuel tank will not protect against incendiary bullets.

NA TS3: EU TS3: 54.36.237.I just read this question and answer, which seems to confirm my fears that an incendiary bullet will still destroy you if it hits your fuel. If you're new, read this guide and then this one.Apply for a flair here! TEMPORARILY OUT OF ORDER.Apply for any of the EU, NA or SEA clans.Join the in-game channel RDDT (EU) to chat with fellow Redditors.Pick the flair that matches your server group or clan and enter your WoT-username.NA, EU and SEA Servers - Use Invite Code: REDDITFOREVER for 7 days of premium time, 500 gold, and a Churchill III.If you see such a post, please report it. New reddit accounts with no or minimal sub activity reposting an old top post will be banned as a karma bot. > No Filter 20 link/comment karma and >20 days old.WoT-Life (server stats, player/clan stats).GOSU Tactics (tourney info, player/clan stats).WoTInspector (Armor models, replay review, heatmaps, etc.).Tomato.gg (detailed player, tank, and server stats).Tanks.gg (tank stats, armor models, comparisons, player stats, etc.).RDDTX (OPEN, Platooning/Strongholds(6)).RDDT6 (OPEN, Platooning/Strongholds(6 & 8)).

Im just saying if ww2 were a seris of 1v1 tank battles